Topic: rant
I spent some time reading right and left-wing blogs yesterday - as usual the vitriol on either side was intense. Yet in this case the left wing seems to have the upper hand.
After all, their basic argument - please help these poor people who have been left to drown and die holds far truer than it was nature's fault, it couldn't have been predicted, it was the mayor and the governor's fault for not showing early strong leadership...it was Clinton's fault for taking away FEMA funding in the 90s...
All those pieces are a little true. I was not impressed by the governor of Lousiana, and I don't know what Mayor Nagin was doing before his heartfelt radio address last week slapped some sense into the Feds and changed their piss-poor backpedaling "uh, we're coming...we didn't know it would be this bad." It's true that Clinton and Bush presided over White Houses during times when funding was decreased for updating the levees.
Hurricanes are going to happen, though. In a meteorlogic and geological sense, that hurricaines and earthquakes will happen is predictable as the sunrise. And anyone with kidnergarten math skills could see as Katrina hovered over New Orleans that it was Category 5/4, and the levees were rated for Category 3. Four is one more than three.
My take on this whole tragedy - there was a vacuum of leadership. The first signs of leadership I seem to remember was the governor of Texas of all people opening up the schools and shelters and thinking ahead. According to my parents, in Austin, the shelters there were being readied since Friday BEFORE the storm! The national guard should have been deployed days earlier. The first speech by the president should have been at least a day earlier, and much stronger in tone and focus. And if the dipshit head of Homeland Security (oops, my anger is popping out) compares this to an "atomic bomb" being dropped on the city one more time, I'm going to beat on my TV screen. Go ahead and drop an atomic bomb on New Orleans, Dipshit Cabinet Officer, and see how much worse that could be.
Because there wasn't an atomic bomb. There were highways left in place, people on bridges in the sweaty last days of August who could have used those days to relocate rather than being forced to wait.
Leadership could have steadied the worries, got people to stop freaking out and start collecting themselves. Organize marches out of the city, organized food and water, ordered the buses down sooner.
Instead this was a national disgrace on racial lines baring the dark heart of haves and have nots in America. The poorest, most vulnerable people died for no reason. Forget party lines, forget admiring people because they are democrats or republicans or jedi knights or vegitarians.
We are vulnerable. Our manufacturing jobs are disappearing, replaced by low paying service jobs and health care positions. The value of our dollar is based on nothing but our credit as a nation. And fiscal policy in this country gives poeple incentive to borrow borrow borrow and consume, but not save. Or save in the domestic stock market which may go up, but who cares as the dollar's value falls and falls.
Stop telling us not to worry, stop urging us to consume to save the economy. Stop telling the vulnerable that help will be on the way soon and they'll be taken care of. We have to step back, to save, to protect the vulnerable and switch the incentives so that we can be responsible for ourselves.
Leadership is telling the people what they don't want to hear sometimes. I don't understand a president who is decisive for decisive's sake on complex issues such as the economy, stem cells, and war... but can't make an early decision and show leadership when being decisive early on would save lives.
Posted by bisous
at 10:50 AM EDT